Business groups ask senators to overturn NLRB’s ‘micro-union’ decision (Read More…)
By Kevin Bogardus - 06/12/12
More than a half-dozen business groups are asking Senate appropriators to roll back a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision that allows unions to form smaller bargaining units.
In a letter sent Tuesday, trade associations including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Retail Federation, the Retail Industry Leaders Association and the International Franchise Association asked lawmakers to overturn an August 2011 ruling that they argue allows labor to create “micro-unions.”
“The micro-unions decision overturns more than 50 years of precedent and would create division in the workplace, increase operational complexities and costs, while also depriving employees of the flexibility and cross-training opportunities they seek. For example, under the micro-union decision organizers could cherry-pick a small segment of employees within one department of one location and target them in an organizing campaign,” said the letter.
The letter was sent to Sens. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Appropriations Committee. The letter was also sent to Sens. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations subcommittee.
The business group asked the senators to send “a strong message” to the NLRB about the decision when they consider funding for the Labor, Health and Human Services spending bill.
The NLRB says the decision did not create new criteria for determining the size of unions’ bargaining units outside of healthcare facilities. But business groups have pushed back against that assertion.
In the letter, the groups said workers outside the healthcare field have used the NLRB ruling to form unions. They pointed to organizing at a Bergdorf Goodman store, a Nestle-Dreyer’s Ice Cream plant and a Dollar Thrifty car rental site.
“Congress must act in order to prevent the case from being applied further. Should Congress fail to do so, this decision will have an immediate and lasting effect on individual employees, job creators, and the economy,” said the letter.
Posted by Admin on 06/12 at 12:46 PM
Unions are clear losers in Walker victory (Read More…)
By Jason Stein of the Journal Sentinel
Madison - Voters dealt a blow to the nation’s public sector unions Tuesday in the state that first granted them broad bargaining power more than a half century ago.
In the first recall in U.S. history in which an incumbent governor retained office, Wisconsin chose to keep the governor who sparked the recall by eliminating most collective bargaining for most public employees as well as their ability to collect dues through payroll deductions.
Though public unions will not disappear as a result, they were the clear losers in a race that confirmed Gov. Scott Walker as a national star for Republicans. They now have no prospects for recovering what they lost, with neither the money nor manpower they had when Walker rose to office.
Marty Beil, executive director of the Wisconsin State Employees Union, said his group would continue in much the way it did more than a half century ago, when it had no bargaining rights.
“We aren’t going to go away,” Beil said. “We’re not going to pull a blanket over our head and pee in our pajamas.”
Less clear is whether President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign will suffer as a result in November - with positive exit polling for the president Tuesday tempering Walker’s headline-grabbing victory. The recall victory is a psychological boost for Republicans and confirms Wisconsin’s status as a battleground state. But the presidential election is still five months away, and experts have not found a statistical advantage to having a governor from the same party as the presidential candidate.
Walker took 53% of the vote in November 2010 - 1.13 million votes - to Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett’s 47% when he won their first matchup.
Exit polling showed voters roughly even divided and passionate in their feelings about whether Walker had handled the collective bargaining issue correctly.
Jennifer Duffy, who follows governor’s races around the country at The Cook Political Report, said before the results that a victory for Walker will mean that more politicians around the country will be emboldened to take on public-sector unions.
“It will give some other governors a dose of bravery,” Duffy said.
Tim Phillips, president of the free-market conservative group Americans for Prosperity, agreed. Walker received support in the form of millions of dollars in ads run by right-wing groups like Americans for Prosperity, which includes among its wealthy backers the industrialists Charles and David Koch.
“It shows that people will have their back,” Phillips said of leaders willing to antagonize unions.
Labor groups showed some strength of their own, helping to gather more than 900,000 valid signatures to force the recall election against Walker and successfully recalling two Republican state senators last summer who had voted for the collective bargaining repeal.
But unions failed to get even their preferred candidate through the Democratic primary in the recall. They spent more than $4 million to back former Dane County executive Kathleen Falk, only to see her beaten badly by Barrett in the primary and the resources lost for the more critical general election.
Joseph Slater, a professor of law at the University of Toledo in Ohio who has written extensively about public unions in Wisconsin and other states, said they will have a diminished role going forward.
“Even though they don’t have collective bargaining rights, unions can still hang around and do stuff . . . but they’ll be a lot less powerful and a lot less influential,” Slater said.
Beil’s union is no exception.
Beil acknowledged that the state employees union has reduced somewhat its average dues amount and still seen between 25% and 40% - he won’t be more specific - of its members stop paying dues. As a result, the union has had to leave some of its jobs unfilled when the positions open up and will have less money for other efforts.
In addition, Beil’s union and most others that are part of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees decided last year not to seek annual recertification elections under a difficult-to-satisfy provision in Walker’s law. That meant at the time that those unions could still exist but government employers did not have to recognize them.
The Wisconsin Education Association Council, which represents most public school teachers, still has two-thirds of its local unions under contract with school districts, said Mary Bell, WEAC’s president. Of the remaining one-third without a contract, about 70% are paying dues, Bell said.
In August, WEAC laid off 40% of its staff when the provisions of Walker’s legislation kicked in that allowed public employees to opt out of paying union dues and prohibited government employers from collecting those dues for unions. Bell said the union has kept its number of positions steady since that layoff of some 40 workers.
Many teachers’ unions did win recertification elections. But they can bargain with school districts only over limited aspects of their pay.
“Win or lose, we don’t give up advocating for our members,” Bell said.
The blow to labor groups in Wisconsin is also significant, Slater said, because in 1959 Wisconsin became the first state in the country to grant bargaining rights to public employees. The loss also matters to the broader labor movement because members of public employee unions now outnumber those in private-sector unions.
William P. Jones, a labor historian at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said that the loss for unions in Wisconsin is part of a generation of legal setbacks.
But Slater cautioned that there were other national lessons from the last year and a half. He pointed out that in his home state of Ohio, GOP Gov. John Kasich suffered an embarrassment last year when a similar rollback of collective bargaining for public employees was struck down by voters in a resounding referendum.
Still, Slater said some governors may still see reasons for caution in the challenges faced by Kasich and Walker.
“If the economy is perceived to be getting better, you’ll see less of this. If the economy is perceived to be getting worse, you’ll see more of this regardless of what happens to Scott Walker,” Slater said.
There is one small area of optimism for unions: a March ruling by a federal judge that struck down limited aspects of Walker’s legislation as unconstitutional.
Specifically, the judge struck down a part of the law that said unions had to be recertified annually by getting a majority of all potential members to vote to keep a union, rather than simply a majority of those voting. He also struck down a provision that barred the state from deducting dues from the paychecks of those who chose to join unions.
That opened up the possibility that labor groups like the Wisconsin State Employees Union can regain their official status with the state, though they can do much less with that status than they could at the time Walker took office.
For Obama and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney, the results in Wisconsin were far from definitive. The two races are separated by five months in which the position of the president could strengthen or deteriorate.
Wisconsin hasn’t been won by a Republican candidate for president since Ronald Reagan’s re-election landslide in 1984.
In addition, the exit polling among voters Tuesday showed Obama leading 51-45 among those who showed up to cast their ballots. Charles Franklin, a pollster at Marquette University Law School, said those responses confirmed his own survey last week that showed both Walker and Obama up in the state.
Obama’s campaign provided resources to the recall effort but not its candidate - the president didn’t campaign in the state for Barrett. Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus said the president could pay a price with Democrats in the fall for that.
“The president abandoned his base in this recall, so he shouldn’t be surprised if they return the favor in November,” Priebus, the former head of the Wisconsin GOP, said in a statement.
Franklin agreed that Romney and Republicans could still get a psychological boost from Walker’s victory and be motivated to spend more resources and work harder in the state this fall. But he said that would be less important than some people imagine.
Voters in Wisconsin, he said , have routinely elected both Republicans and Democrats in statewide elections, making the June vote no guarantee for November.
Posted by Admin on 06/05 at 11:36 PM